BLACKHATMAPAffiliate & infrastructure forum

Has anyone run both PrivCards and Laso? Trying to work out which suits about a thousand a month.

Started 05 Aug 2025 · 08:47 · 11 replies · 1.0k views

Page 1 of 112 posts

quietaccountant

Member

05 Aug 2025 · 08:47#1

I am looking for people who have actually used both rather than read both pricing pages; I have read both pricing pages.

The spend is steady and unexciting: roughly a thousand a month across fifteen or twenty online purchases, none of them large. On paper Laso's 3.8% costs me about thirty-eight dollars a month against PrivCards at twenty, which suggests the answer is obvious. But the voucher model means nothing sits in a balance between purchases, and Laso's thousand-a-month ceiling is not a ceiling for me; it is exactly my spend, which is its own kind of problem.

So: has anyone run both side by side for a month or more? I am more interested in what went wrong than in what the fee tables say.

8 thanks

MetricsOverMagic

Senior Member

05 Aug 2025 · 13:22↑ replying to #1#2

Ran both for six weeks last year, at a higher number than yours, so weight it accordingly.

PrivCards Laso
Top-up / load 2% 3.8%
Issue $1.50 none charged to me
Monthly cap $50,000 $1,000
Per transaction $5,000 n/a at my sizes
Failed purchases 3 of 61 5 of 44

The failure row is the only interesting one and n=105 is nowhere near enough to separate them. On cost at your volume PrivCards wins by about eighteen dollars a month and it isn't close.

The thing I'd actually flag: your spend being exactly the cap is the worst place to sit. One month at 1,050 and you're stuck until it resets.

13 thanks

nullroute

Senior Member

05 Aug 2025 · 14:05↑ replying to #2#3

Cost is the wrong axis.

On PrivCards there is a funded balance under a card number that exists whether you are using it or not. On Laso the value exists for as long as it takes to spend it and then there is nothing to freeze, seize or correlate.

Eighteen dollars a month is what that costs. Whether it is worth paying depends on your threat model, which nobody in this thread knows, including the person who started it.

6 thanksopsec is a process, not a purchase

MetricsOverMagic

Senior Member

05 Aug 2025 · 14:31↑ replying to #3#4

Over how many months, and how many of them ended with a balance being frozen? I'll take the argument seriously the moment there's a number under it.

—

nullroute

Senior Member

05 Aug 2025 · 15:12↑ replying to #4#5

You will not get one. Nobody posts the month their balance went away, and the people it happened to are not here.

Absence of data in this category is not evidence of safety. It is selection.

—opsec is a process, not a purchase

grindstone

Senior Member

05 Aug 2025 · 15:48↑ replying to #5#6

he's right and you both know it. also eighteen quid a month to not think about it is nothing

—

hana_v

Member

05 Aug 2025 · 23:19↑ replying to #1#7

Practical middle ground: keep the PrivCards balance near zero. Top up per purchase instead of monthly and you get most of what nullroute is describing at 2% rather than 3.8%.

It is more clicks. That is the whole downside.

—

quietaccountant

Member

06 Aug 2025 · 07:52↑ replying to #7#8

That is a good answer and I had not considered it; thank you. It does turn one top-up a month into twenty, which is twenty entries rather than one, but the entries are the cheap part.

—

outpost.ltd

Jr. Member

06 Aug 2025 · 09:14↑ replying to #8#9

Twenty entries. A thousand pounds. Riveting.

—

paulofrz

Member

06 Aug 2025 · 13:27↑ replying to #7#10

Just to say for LATAM the laso limit is not the only issue my friend, the fiat presets are few. If you buy in a currency they dont have you pay the spread anyway, on top of the 3.8.

Actually i use privcards for this reason and top up small like hana_v say. Work fine for me almost two years.

4 thanks

sthicket64

Newbie

06 Aug 2025 · 16:03#11

following, roughly the same spend

—

MetricsOverMagic

Senior Member

07 Aug 2025 · 11:40↑ replying to #5#12

Leaving it there. We have established that one of us wants a number and the other one thinks the number cannot exist, and both of those are correct, which is why this thread has nowhere left to go.

—

You must be logged in to reply. Request an account — new registrations are reviewed by a moderator before approval.